ZAMONAVIY TILSHUNOSLIKDA GIPERONIM-GIPONIM MUNOSABATLARNING STRUKTUR TAHLILI

Mualliflar

  • Dilfuza Mukarova Jizzax davlat pedagogika universiteti Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67227/g8v1t596

Kalit so‘zlar:

Giponimiya, giperonim, leksik semantika, semantik maydon, iyerarxik tuzilish, tur-jins munosabatlari, kognitiv tilshunoslik, leksik tizim, valentlik, semantik inklyuziya

Abstrak

Ushbu maqolada tilshunoslikning muhim yo‘nalishlaridan biri bo‘lgan leksik-semantik munosabatlar, xususan, giponimiya fenomeni tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqotda jahon va o‘zbek tilshunosligining nazariy qarashlari umumlashtirilgan holda, giponimik iyerarxiya va semantik maydon masalalari ko‘rib chiqiladi. Maqolada so‘zlarning tur-jins munosabatlari tizimli hamda kognitiv nuqtayi nazardan yoritilgan.

Yuklashlar

Yuklab olish maʼlumotlari hali mavjud emas.

Havolalar

1. Djumabaeva J., Sabirova N. The Study of Hyponymic Taxonomy in English Linguistics and the Lexical and Semantic Relations of Hyponymy // Ilkogretim Online — Elementary Education Online. — 2020. — Vol. 19. — № 4. — P. 870–878.

2. Brinton L.J. The Structure of Modern English: A Linguistic Introduction. — Illustrated ed. — Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2000. — P. 112.

3. Fromkin V., Rodman R. Introduction to Language. — 6th ed. — Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1998. — P. 250.

4. Rasulov R. O‘zbek tilidagi holat fe’llari va ularning obligator valentliklari. — Toshkent: Fan, 1989. — 68 b.

5. Amaro R., Mendes S., Marrafa P. Increasing Density through New Relations and PoS Encoding in WordNet.PT // International Journal of Computational Linguistics and Applications. — India: Bahri Publications, 2013. — P. 1–12.

6. Cruse D.A. Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. — New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. — P. 356.

7. Chafe W. Meaning and the Structure of Language. — Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970. — P. 84; Fillmore C.J. The Case for Case // In: Bach E., Harms R. (eds.). Universals in Linguistic Theory. — New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.

8. Ungerer F., Schmid H.J. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. — London; New York: Longman, 1996. — P. 182–270.

9. Lyons J. Semantics: In 2 vols. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977. — P. 293.

10. Wilkins D.A. Linguistics in Language Teaching. — London: Edward Arnold Press, 1972. — P. 98–158.

11. Wierzbicka A. Semantics: Primes and Universals. — Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

12. Abuzalova M., Nazarova S. Sistem tilshunoslik asoslari. — Buxoro: “Buxoro” nashriyoti, 2010. — 96 b.

13. Baskakov N.A., Sodiqov A., Abduazizov A. Umumiy tilshunoslik. — Toshkent: O‘qituvchi, 1979. — 192 b.

14. Rasulov R. O‘zbek tilidagi holat fe’llari va ularning obligator valentliklari. — Toshkent: Fan, 1989. — B. 56–125.

15. Safarova R. Leksik-semantik munosabatlarning turlari. — Toshkent: O‘qituvchi, 1996. — 48 b.

Yuklab olishlar

Nashr qilingan

2026-05-05

Qanday havola qilish kerak

ZAMONAVIY TILSHUNOSLIKDA GIPERONIM-GIPONIM MUNOSABATLARNING STRUKTUR TAHLILI. (2026). Ijtimoiy-Gumanitar Sohada Ilmiy-Innovatsion Tadqiqotlar, 3(5), 500-504. https://doi.org/10.67227/g8v1t596