KONTRASTIV METODNING TILDAGI LAKUNALARNI ANIQLASHDAGI METODOLOGIK IMKONIYATLARI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67227/4xmd8p68Kalit so‘zlar:
kontrastiv metod, kontrastiv tahlil, lakuna, lakunarlik, tillararo muvofiqlik, nol ekvivalentlik, qiyoslash mezoni, semantik nomutanosiblik.Abstrak
Ushbu maqolada kontrastiv metodning tildagi lakunalarni aniqlashdagi metodologik imkoniyatlari tahlil qilinadi. Tillarni umumiy qiyoslash mezoni asosida solishtirish, to‘liq, qisman va nol muvofiqliklarni belgilash hamda lakunalarni leksik, grammatik, semantik va pragmatik turlarga ajratish bosqichlari o‘zbek va ingliz tillari misolida yoritiladi. Tadqiqotda metodning afzalliklari va amaliy cheklovlari ham aniqlanadi.
Yuklashlar
Havolalar
1. Anokhina T. The Linguistic Lacunicon: Cognitive Mapping in Schemes and Terms // Journal of Education Culture and Society. – 2013. – Vol. 4, No. 1. – P. 166–174. – DOI: 10.15503/jecs20131.166.174.
2. Odiljonovich X. E. Zamonaviy Britaniya ingliz tilining (Received Pronunciation) fonetik tizimida so‘z urg‘usining joylashuvidagi o‘zgarishlar // Advances in Science and Humanities. – 2026. – Vol. 2, No. 5. – B. 100–104. – DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1234567.
3. Fisiak J. (Ed.). Further Insights into Contrastive Analysis. – Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1991. – DOI: 10.1075/cilt.60.
4. Odiljonovich K. E. Assimilation in English and Uzbek Phonetics: A Comparative Study // Advances in Science and Education. – 2026. – Vol. 2, No. 3. – P. 37–40. – DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2345678.
5. Johansson S. Seeing through Multilingual Corpora: On the Use of Corpora in Contrastive Studies. – Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2007. – DOI: 10.1075/scl.26.
6. Wierzbicka A. Understanding Cultures through Their Key Words: English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese. – New York–Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
7. Khasanov E. Phonological and Prosodic Analysis of Stress Systems in English and Uzbek // International Conference on Social Sciences & Humanities. – 2025. – Vol. 1, No. 2. – P. 84–86. – DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3456789.
