HUQUQNING MADANIYATLARARO MOHIYATI: UNIVERSALLIK VA MILLIY-HUQUQIY O‘ZIGA XOSLIK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67227/ecyps278Kalit so‘zlar:
huquq, madaniyatlararo fenomen, huquqiy plyuralizm, huquqiy madaniyat, universalizm, madaniy relativizm, dialog.Abstrak
Huquq odatda davlat tomonidan belgilangan va majburiy kuch bilan ta’minlanadigan normalar tizimi sifatida tavsiflanadi. Biroq turli madaniy muhitlar o‘zaro kesishayotgan sharoitda bunday ta’rif huquqning real ijtimoiy hayotini to‘liq ochib bera olmaydi. Maqolada huquq madaniyatlararo fenomen sifatida tahlil qilinib, huquqiy norma, madaniy ma’no, mahalliy ijtimoiy amaliyot va universal huquqiy qadriyatlar o‘rtasidagi munosabat ko‘rib chiqiladi. Huquqiy plyuralizm, huquqiy transplant, “huquqiy irritant”, huquqlarni mahalliylashtirish va madaniy tarjima konsepsiyalari qiyosiy tahlil qilinadi. Universalizm va madaniy relativizm qarama-qarshiligini mutlaq ziddiyat sifatida qabul qilish o‘rniga, inson qadr-qimmati va asosiy huquqlarni cheklanmaydigan normativ minimum sifatida saqlagan holda, ularning ijtimoiy ifodasi madaniy muloqot orqali shakllanishi mumkinligi asoslanadi. Natijada huquqning madaniyatlararo amal qilishini izohlovchi kontekstual-dialogik model taklif etiladi. Model normativ yadro, madaniy kontekst, huquqiy tarjima, huquqlar filtri va dialogik verifikatsiya bosqichlarini birlashtiradi. O‘zbekiston huquqiy makoni misolida davlat huquqi, xalqaro standartlar va tarixiy-madaniy tajriba o‘rtasidagi munosabatlarni talqin qilish imkoniyatlari ko‘rsatiladi.
Yuklashlar
Havolalar
1. Griffiths J. What is Legal Pluralism? // The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law. – 1986. – Vol. 18, No. 24. – P. 1–55. – DOI: 10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387. (DOI)
URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387
2. Tamanaha B. Z. Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global // Sydney Law Review. – 2008. – Vol. 30, No. 3. – P. 375–411. (AustLII)
URL: https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/SydLawRw/2008/20.html
3. Menski W. F. Comparative Law in a Global Context: The Legal Systems of Asia and Africa. – 2nd ed. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. – 696 p. – DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511606687. (Cambridge)
URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606687
4. Berman P. S. Global Legal Pluralism // Southern California Law Review. – 2007. – Vol. 80. – P. 1155–1237. (Southern California Law Review)
URL: https://southerncalifornialawreview.com/2007/09/04/global-legal-pluralism-article-by-paul-berman/
5. Twining W. General Jurisprudence: Understanding Law from a Global Perspective. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. – 544 p. – DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807374. (Cambridge)
URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807374
6. Watson A. Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law. – 2nd ed. – Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1993. – 144 p. (Georgia Press)
URL: https://www.ugapress.org/9780820315324/legal-transplants/
7. Legrand P. The Impossibility of ‘Legal Transplants’ // Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. – 1997. – Vol. 4, No. 2. – P. 111–124. – DOI: 10.1177/1023263X9700400202. (Sage Journals)
URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X9700400202
8. Teubner G. Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Divergencies // The Modern Law Review. – 1998. – Vol. 61, No. 1. – P. 11–32. – DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.00125. (Wiley Online Library)
URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00125
9. Merry S. E. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. – Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006. – 269 p. (Google Books)
URL: https://books.google.com/books?id=DBoZ-orVLj0C
10. Merry S. E. Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism: Mapping the Middle // American Anthropologist. – 2006. – Vol. 108, No. 1. – P. 38–51. – DOI: 10.1525/aa.2006.108.1.38. (DOI)
URL: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2006.108.1.38
11. An-Na’im A. A. (ed.). Human Rights in Cross-Cultural Perspectives: A Quest for Consensus. – Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1992. – 479 p. (Google Books)
URL: https://books.google.com/books?id=hBGy9X18qRsC
12. Donnelly J. Cultural Relativism and Universal Human Rights // Human Rights Quarterly. – 1984. – Vol. 6, No. 4. – P. 400–419. – DOI: 10.2307/762182. (JSTOR)
URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/762182
13. Baderin M. A. International Human Rights and Islamic Law. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. – DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199285402.001.0001. (OUP Academic)
URL: https://academic.oup.com/book/12335
14. Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action. – Adopted by the World Conference on Human Rights, Vienna, 25 June 1993. – United Nations. (КНПЧ)
URL: https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/vienna.pdf
15. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. – Adopted by UN General Assembly Resolution 217 A (III), 10 December 1948. – United Nations. (ООН)
URL: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
16. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Konstitutsiyasi. – Yangi tahrir, 30.04.2023.
URL: https://lex.uz/docs/6445147
17. Расулов Х. Правовая культура: социально-политические факторы проблемы // Общество и инновации. – 2021. – Т. 2, № 10/S. – С. 335–342. – DOI: 10.47689/2181-1415-vol2-iss10/S-pp335-342. (inLibrary)
URL: https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol2-iss10/S-pp335-342
18. Santos B. de Sousa. Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization and Emancipation. – 2nd ed. – London: Butterworths LexisNexis, 2002. – 565 p. (WorldCat)
URL: https://search.worldcat.org/title/50176080
19. Geertz C. Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. – New York: Basic Books, 1983. – 244 p. (Google Books)
