ARGUMENTATIV MUNOZARANING RIVOJLANTIRUVCHI IMKONIYATLARI: HAMKORLIKDAGI DALILLASH ORQALI BO‘LAJAK PEDAGOGLARNING TAHLILIY POZITSIYASINI SHAKLLANTIRISH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67227/28xq6j86Kalit so‘zlar:
argumentativ munozara; hamkorlikdagi dalillash; tahliliy pozitsiya; qarshi dalil; refleksiya; bo‘lajak pedagog.Abstrak
Maqolada bo‘lajak pedagogning tahliliy pozitsiyasini hamkorlikdagi dalillash orqali shakllantirish nazariy-metodik jihatdan o‘rganiladi. Konseptual tahlil va didaktik modellashtirish asosida olti bosqichli metodika va olti mezonli rubrika taklif etiladi. Dalilni tekshirish, qarshi fikrni qayta ifodalash va xulosani asosli yangilash o‘zaro bog‘lanadi.
Yuklashlar
Havolalar
1. Asterhan C. S. C., Schwarz B. B. Argumentation for Learning: Well-Trodden Paths and Unexplored Territories // Educational Psychologist. – 2016. – Vol. 51, № 2. – P. 164–187. – DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458.
2. Iordanou K., Constantinou C. P. Developing Pre-Service Teachers’ Evidence-Based Argumentation Skills on Socio-Scientific Issues // Learning and Instruction. – 2014. – Vol. 34. – P. 42–57. – DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.07.004.
3. Altun E., Ozsevgec T. Making Argumentation-Based Learning and Teaching Happen: Exploring the Development of Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Argumentation Competencies // Science & Education. – 2025. – Vol. 34. – P. 4057–4106. – DOI: 10.1007/s11191-024-00612-1.
4. Toulmin S. E. The Uses of Argument. – Updated ed. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. – DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511840005.
5. Mercer N., Dawes L., Wegerif R., Sams C. Reasoning as a Scientist: Ways of Helping Children to Use Language to Learn Science // British Educational Research Journal. – 2004. – Vol. 30, № 3. – P. 359–377. – DOI: 10.1080/01411920410001689689.
6. Michaels S., O’Connor C., Resnick L. B. Deliberative Discourse Idealized and Realized: Accountable Talk in the Classroom and in Civic Life // Studies in Philosophy and Education. – 2008. – Vol. 27. – P. 283–297. – DOI: 10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1.
7. Weinberger A., Fischer F. A Framework to Analyze Argumentative Knowledge Construction in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning // Computers & Education. – 2006. – Vol. 46, № 1. – P. 71–95. – DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003.
8. Kollar I., Fischer F., Hesse F. W. Collaboration Scripts – A Conceptual Analysis // Educational Psychology Review. – 2006. – Vol. 18, № 2. – P. 159–185. – DOI: 10.1007/s10648-006-9007-2.
9. Iordanou K., Rapanta C. “Argue with Me”: A Method for Developing Argument Skills // Frontiers in Psychology. – 2021. – Vol. 12. – Art. 631203. – DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631203.
10. Nussbaum E. M., Dove I. J., Putney L. G. Bridging Dialogic Pedagogy and Argumentation Theory through Critical Questions // Dialogic Pedagogy. – 2023. – Vol. 11, № 3. – P. A7–A25. – DOI: 10.5195/dpj.2023.548.
11. Rapanta C. Can Teachers Implement a Student-Centered Dialogical Argumentation Method across the Curriculum? // Teaching and Teacher Education. – 2021. – Vol. 105. – Art. 103404. – DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2021.103404.
12. Iordanou K., Fotiou C. Supporting Integration of Multiple Source Perspectives through Dialogic Argumentation // Frontline Learning Research. – 2025. – Vol. 13, № 1. – P. 22–44. – DOI: 10.14786/flr.v13i1.1241.
