INGLIZ, O‘ZBEK VA QORAQALPOQ TILLARIDA METONIMIYANING SEMANTIK VA PRAGMATIK JIHATLARI: METONIMIYA VA METAFORA O‘RTASIDAGI CHEGARANI ANIQLASH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67227/7qdn3v52Kalit so‘zlar:
metonimiya, metafora, semantika, pragmatika, kognitiv lingvistika, pragmatik inferensiya, kontekstual ma’no.Abstrak
Ushbu maqolada metonimiyaning semantik va pragmatik xususiyatlari kognitiv lingvistika doirasida hamda uning metafora bilan chegarasi nuqtayi nazaridan tadqiq etiladi. Metonimiyaning asosiy konseptual modellari (muallif — asar, idish — mazmun, joy — odamlar, muassasa — vakillar), ularni talqin qilishda kontekst va madaniy bilimlarning o‘rni, shuningdek, metonimiyani metaforadan farqlovchi mezonlar tavsiflanadi.
Yuklashlar
Havolalar
1. Barcelona A. (ed.). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. – Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000.
2. Bekbergenov A. Qaraqalpaq tiliniń stilistikası. – Nókis: Bilim, 1990.
3. Berdimuratov E. Ádebiy tildiń funktsionallıq stilleriniń rawajlanıwı menen qaraqalpaq leksikasınıń rawajlanıwı. – Nókis, 1973.
4. Krišković A., Tominac S. Metonymy Based on Cultural Background Knowledge and Pragmatic Inferencing: Evidence from Spoken Discourse // Fluminensia. – 2009. – Vol. 21, № 2. – P. 49–72. – URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/48358.
5. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. – Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
6. Panther K.-U., Thornburg L. L. (eds.). Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing. – Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2003. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.113.
7. Radden G., Kövecses Z. Towards a Theory of Metonymy // Metonymy in Language and Thought / ed. by K.-U. Panther, G. Radden. – Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1999. – P. 17–59. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.03rad.
8. Shakespeare W. Julius Caesar. – Act 3, Scene 2.
