NOANIQLIK KATEGORIYASINING ZAMONAVIY TILSHUNOSLIKDAGI NAZARIY TALQINLARI VA ILMIY YONDASHUVLAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67227/nk7mzh07Kalit so‘zlar:
noaniqlik, epistemik modallik, hedjing, kognitiv tilshunoslik, pragmatika, diskurs, lisoniy kategoriya.Abstrak
Maqolada zamonaviy tilshunoslikda noaniqlik kategoriyasini o‘rganishning asosiy nazariy yondashuvlari ko‘rib chiqiladi. Mantiqiy-semantik, modal, kognitiv, pragmatik va diskursiv talqinlar qiyosiy tahlil qilinadi. Kontekst, so‘zlovchining pozitsiyasi va kommunikativ maqsadni hisobga olgan holda til vositalarini kompleks tahlil qilish zarurati asoslab beriladi.
Yuklashlar
Havolalar
1. Lakoff G. Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts // Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. – Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 1972. – P. 183–228. – URL: https://www.umich.edu/~jlawler/lakoffhedgesCLS8.pdf.
2. Rubin V. L. Epistemic Modality: From Uncertainty to Certainty in the Context of Information Seeking as Interactions with Texts // Information Processing & Management. – 2010. – Vol. 46, № 5. – P. 533–540. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2010.02.006.
3. Hyland K. A Pragmatic Analysis of Hedging // Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. – Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1998. – P. 156–188. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.54.08apr.
4. Míguez V. On Epistemic Modality and Discourse Strategy: Evidence from Galician Adverbs // Journal of Pragmatics. – 2022. – Vol. 201. – P. 32–42. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.09.003.
5. Hyland K. Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. – Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1998. – 308 p. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.54.
