THE EVOLUTION OF THE IRONIC–PARODIC METHOD IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK NOVELLAS
Keywords:
irony, metamorphosis, modus, stylistics, comparison, philosophy, ethics, authorship, ideality.Abstract
This study offers a comprehensive examination of the methodological foundations and interpretive criteria that shape the use of irony in the literary works of George Orwell and Luqmon Burikhon. Particular emphasis is placed on the authors’ strategies for unveiling and critiquing ideological constructs characterized by totalitarian discourse. The article further elucidates the analytical pathways through which the identified problems are addressed, while assessing the internal logic, coherence, and continuity of the evaluative parameters employed within the texts.
References
1. Quronov D., Mamajonov Z., Sheraliyeva M. Adabiyotshunoslik lug‘ati. –T: “Akademnashr”. 2013. –B.132.
2. Nazar Eshonqul. Mendan “men”gacha. –T: “Akademnashr”. 2015. –B.381.
3. Jorj Oruell. 1945. Vayronalar. –T: “INFOKAPITALBOOKS”. 2025. –B. 110-111.
4. https://ziyouz.uz/ilm-va-fan/adabiyot/marhabo-qochqorova-kinoyaviy-badiiy-parodiya/#_ftn1
5. Attardo, S. Irony as Relevant Inappropriateness.
6. Gibbs, R.W. Irony in Talk Among Friends.
7. Grice, H.P. Logic and Conversation.
8. Kovecses, Z. Language, Culture, and Metaphor: Conceptualizations of irony
