INGLIZ VA O‘ZBEK TILLARIDA NUTQIY MA'NO VA KOMMUNIKATIV FUNKSIYALAR OVERLAP HODISASI: PRAGMALINGVISTIK TAHLIL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67227/890nae42Kalit so‘zlar:
overlap, pragmalingvistika, nutqiy ma'no, kommunikativ funksiya, illokutiv kuch, implikatura, presuppozitsiya, diskurs, qiyosiy tilshunoslik, pragmatik strategiya.Abstrak
Mazkur maqolada ingliz va o‘zbek tillarida nutqiy ma'no va kommunikativ funksiyalar overlap hodisasi pragmalingvistik nuqtayi nazardan tadqiq etiladi. Tadqiqotning maqsadi overlap hodisasining pragmatik mexanizmlarini aniqlash, uning yuzaga kelishida illokutiv kuch, implikatura, presuppozitsiya, diskurs konteksti va kommunikativ strategiyalarning rolini ochib berishdan iborat. Tadqiqotda qiyosiy-tipologik, pragmalingvistik, diskursiv hamda lingvokognitiv tahlil metodlaridan foydalanildi. Tahlillar natijasida overlap hodisasi semantik birlikning ichki xususiyati emas, balki pragmatik strategiyalar integratsiyasi natijasida shakllanadigan ko‘p bosqichli kommunikativ hodisa ekanligi asoslandi. Ingliz va o‘zbek tillarida overlapning yuzaga kelish mexanizmlaridagi universal va milliy xususiyatlar aniqlandi hamda pragmatik tahlil uchun yangi konseptual model taklif qilindi. Tadqiqot natijalari pragmalingvistika, diskurs tahlili, qiyosiy tilshunoslik, tarjimashunoslik va tabiiy tilni qayta ishlash yo‘nalishlarida overlap hodisasini tadqiq etishning nazariy hamda amaliy asoslarini kengaytiradi.
Yuklashlar
Havolalar
1. Austin J. L. How to Do Things with Words. — Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962. — 168 p.
2. Searle J. R. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969. — 203 p.
3. Grice H. P. Logic and Conversation // Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech Acts / Eds. P. Cole, J. L. Morgan. — New York: Academic Press, 1975. — P. 41–58.
4. Levinson S. C. Pragmatics. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983. — 420 p.
5. Leech G. N. Principles of Pragmatics. — London: Longman, 1983. — 250 p.
6. Brown P., Levinson S. C. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. — 345 p.
7. Halliday M. A. K., Matthiessen C. M. I. M. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd ed. — London: Arnold, 2004. — 689 p.
8. Fraser B. What Are Discourse Markers? // Journal of Pragmatics. — 1999. — Vol. 31, No. 7. — P. 931–952.
9. Redeker G. Ideational and Pragmatic Markers of Discourse Structure // Journal of Pragmatics. — 1990. — Vol. 14, No. 3. — P. 367–381.
10. Pons Bordería S. Do Discourse Markers Exist? On the Treatment of Discourse Markers in Relevance Theory // Journal of Pragmatics. — 2008. — Vol. 40, No. 8. — P. 1411–1434.
11. Wierzbicka A. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. — Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1991. — 502 p.
12. Levinson S. C. Speech Acts // The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics / Ed. Y. Huang. — Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. — P. 199–216.
13. Pons Bordería S., Fischer K. Using Discourse Segmentation to Account for the Polyfunctionality of Discourse Markers: The Case of Well // Journal of Pragmatics. — 2021. — Vol. 173. — P. 101–118.
14. Multifunctionality of Epistemic Stance Markers: Variation across Disciplines and Speaker Roles in Classroom Discourse // Contrastive Pragmatics. — 2023. — Vol. 4, No. 2. — P. 213–242.
15. Fu Y., Lam P. W. Y. From Contrast to Communicational Practice: The Discourse Marker But in Chinese and British Media Interviews // Journal of Pragmatics. — 2026. — Vol. 254. — P. 81–90.
