INSTITUTSIONAL LEGITIMLIKNI SHAKLLANTIRISHDA ADOLAT TAMOYILLARINING FALSAFIY MOHIYATI: DEMOKRATIK BOSHQARUV, JAMOATCHILIK ISHONCHI VA IJTIMOIY HISOBDORLIKNING O‘ZARO ALOQADORLIGI

Mualliflar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67227/zv3k6574

Kalit so‘zlar:

institutsional legitimlik, ijtimoiy adolat, jamoatchilik ishonchi, hisobdorlik, demokratik boshqaruv, protsessual adolat, shaffoflik.

Abstrak

Maqolada institutsional legitimlikni shakllantirishda adolat tamoyillarining falsafiy mohiyati falsafiy va normativ nuqtayi nazardan tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqotning maqsadi adolatni institutsional legitimlik, jamoatchilik ishonchi va ijtimoiy hisobdorlikni o‘zaro bog‘lovchi normativ mexanizm sifatida konseptuallashtirishdan iborat. Metodologik asos sifatida dialektik, konseptual, qiyosiy, aksiologik va refleksiv tahlil usullaridan foydalanilgan.

Yuklashlar

Yuklab olish maʼlumotlari hali mavjud emas.

Havolalar

1. Isroilov D. Yangi O‘zbekistonda ijtimoiy adolat modelining ijtimoiy-falsafiy tahlili // Actual Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences. – 2026. – Vol. 6, № 6. – B. 154–159. – DOI: 10.47390/SPR1342V6I6Y2026N19.

2. Rasulov S. Davlat boshqaruvida odillik prinsipi talqini // Actual Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences. – 2025. – Vol. 5, № 11. – B. 230–233. – DOI: 10.47390/SPR1342V5I11Y2025N41.

3. Павлова М. А. Эволюция конституционного регулирования принципа социальной справедливости // Государственная власть и местное самоуправление. – 2023. – № 4. – С. 41–51. – DOI: 10.34076/22196838_2023_4_41.

4. Омелехина Н. В. Финансовое право в межотраслевом институте достоинства личности // Актуальные проблемы российского права. – 2020. – Т. 15, № 11. – С. 60–75. – DOI: 10.17803/19941471.2020.120.11.060-075.

5. Heffer C. Discourse and Democracy: The TRUST Heuristic and Sample Analyses // All Bullshit and Lies? – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. – P. 233–261. – DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190923280.003.0009.

6. Yasmin S., Ghafran C. Accountability and Legitimacy of Non-Profit Organisations: Challenging the Current Status Quo and Identifying Avenues for Future Research // Financial Accountability & Management. – 2021. – Vol. 37, № 4. – P. 399–418. – DOI: 10.1111/faam.12280.

7. Soto Sainz O. Accountability and Legitimacy: Towards a New Proposal of Typology of the Autocratic and Democratic Systems // Cuadernos de Gobierno y Administración Pública. – 2020. – Vol. 7, № 1. – P. 27–39. – DOI: 10.5209/cgap.68036.

8. Grežo M., Adamus M., Kaššaiová Z. Exploring the Factorial Structure and Criterion Validity of Institutional Trust in Slovakia // Czech Sociological Review. – 2022. – Vol. 58, № 6. – P. 671–698. – DOI: 10.13060/csr.2023.008.

Yuklab olishlar

Nashr qilingan

2026-10-05

Qanday havola qilish kerak

INSTITUTSIONAL LEGITIMLIKNI SHAKLLANTIRISHDA ADOLAT TAMOYILLARINING FALSAFIY MOHIYATI: DEMOKRATIK BOSHQARUV, JAMOATCHILIK ISHONCHI VA IJTIMOIY HISOBDORLIKNING O‘ZARO ALOQADORLIGI. (2026). Ijtimoiy-Gumanitar Sohada Ilmiy-Innovatsion Tadqiqotlar, 3(10), 260-264. https://doi.org/10.67227/zv3k6574