TIMSS STANDARTLARI ASOSIDA TABIIY FANLAR SAVODXONLIGINI BAHOLASH: KONTEKSTUAL TOPSHIRIQLAR VA O‘QUVCHILARNING KOGNITIV RIVOJLANISHI
Annotatsiya
Mazkur tadqiqot umumta’lim maktablarida ta’lim sifati va unga ta’sir etuvchi ko‘p darajali omillar o‘rtasidagi determinant bog‘liqlikni aniqlashga qaratilgan. Tadqiqotning metodologik asosi sifatida TIMSS (2019, 2023) xalqaro baholash dasturining kontekstual so‘rovnomalari va kvantitativ tahlil metodlari tanlab olindi. Maqolada ilk bor ta’lim sifati ko‘rsatkichlari (TIMSS ballari) va unga ta’sir etuvchi pedagogik, maktab muhiti, o‘quvchi sharoiti hamda boshqaruv tizimi o‘zgaruvchilari o‘rtasidagi aloqa ko‘p darajali regressiv model (Random Intercept Model) yordamida modellashtirildi. Empirik tahlil natijalari shuni ko‘rsatdiki, o‘qituvchi sifati (pedagogik malaka va o‘qitish amaliyoti) ta’lim samaradorligini belgilovchi eng ustuvor omil bo‘lib xizmat qilsa, uy resurslari va ijtimoiy-iqtisodiy holat barqaror fon sifatida akademik yutuqlarni modulyatsiya qiladi. Tadqiqot xulosalari ta’lim tizimini monitoring qilish va inson kapitalini rivojlantirishga yo‘naltirilgan strategik qarorlarni qabul qilishda ilmiy-metodik asos bo‘lib xizmat qiladi.
Iqtiboslar
1. Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2020). Education, Knowledge Capital, and Economic Growth. // The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Education. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815391-8.00014-8.
2. Mullis, I. V. S, Martin, M. O., & von Davier, M. (Eds.). (2021). TIMSS 2023 Assessment Frameworks. Retrieved from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center website: https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2023/frameworks/.
3. Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. (2020). Nature of Scientific Knowledge and Scientific Inquiry. // Handbook of Research on Science Education, Volume III. Routledge. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-57646-2_1.
4. Anderson, Lorin W. Krathwohl, David R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman, New York, Complete ed. https://lccn.loc.gov/00063423].
5. Liu, A. S., & Schunn, C. D. (2020). Predicting pathways to optional summer science experiences by socioeconomic status and the impact on science attitudes and skills. // International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00247-y.
6. Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology.
7. Zimmerman, C., & Klahr, D. (2018). Development of Scientific Thinking and Reasoning. // Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119170174.epcn407.
8. Исмаилов А. А. (2022) Национальная оценка образовательных достижений учащихся на основе опыта программы PISA // Universum: психология и образование: электрон. научн. журн. 2022. 10(100). https://7universum.com/ru/psy/archive/item/14360.
9. Darvishxo‘jayev (2026). O‘zbekiston ta'lim tizimida timss natijalaridan foydalanish orqali ta’lim sifatini oshirish imkoniyatlari. // Science time. Scientific journal. Volume: 4, Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18639811.
10. He, P., Chen, I. C., Touitou, I., Bartz, K., Schneider, B., & Krajcik, J. (2023). Predicting student science achievement using post-unit assessment performances in a coherent high school chemistry project-based learning system // Journal of Research in Science Teaching: Volume 60, Issue 4. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21815.
