POSTNORMAL DAVR SHAROITIDA BILIMNI PROBLEMALASHTIRISH
Kalit so‘zlar:
postnormal fan; bilim sifati; kengaytirilgan ekspert hamjamiyati; fan demokratlashuvi; ekologik ong; barqaror rivojlanish; ijtimoiy-ekologik tizimlar.Annotatsiya
Ushbu maqolada postnormal davr sharoitida bilimni problemalashtirishning falsafiy, metodologik va ijtimoiy asoslari tahlil qilinadi. Postnormal fan yuqori noaniqlik, qadriyatlar ziddiyati, murakkab ijtimoiy-ekologik tizimlar va keng ko‘lamli xavflar hukmron bo‘lgan vaziyatlarda ilmiy bilishning yangi modeli sifatida talqin etiladi. Tadqiqotda postnormal fanning an’anaviy “normal fan”dan farqli jihatlari, bilim sifati tushunchasining ustuvorlashuvi, kengaytirilgan ekspert hamjamiyati institutining shakllanishi hamda fan demokratlashuvining epistemologik va axloqiy ahamiyati ochib beriladi. Xalqaro va mintaqaviy amaliy tajribalar asosida postnormal yondashuvning ekologik ongni rivojlantirish, ilm-fanga bo‘lgan ishonchni mustahkamlash va barqaror rivojlanish strategiyalarini ishlab chiqishdagi roli asoslab beriladi. Maqolada postnormal fan zamonaviy ekologik va ijtimoiy inqirozlarni anglash hamda ularni hal etishda muhim nazariy-amaliy paradigma ekanligi xulosa qilinadi.
Iqtiboslar
1. Funtowicz, S. O., Ravetz, J. R. Science for the Post-Normal Age // Futures. – 1993. – Vol. 25, № 7. – P. 739–755.
2. Wynne, B. Misunderstood Misunderstanding: Social Identities and Public Uptake of Science // Public Understanding of Science. – 1992. – Vol. 1, № 3. – P. 281–304.
3. Saltelli, A., Pereira, Â. G., van der Sluijs, J. P. [et al.] What Do I Make of Your Latinorum? Sensitivity Auditing of Mathematical Modelling // Environmental Science & Policy. – 2013. – Vol. 27. – P. 286–297.
4. Беркс, Ф. Священная экология / пер. с англ. В. Н. Кузнецова. – М.: Ноосфера, 2013. – 368 с.
5. Micklin, P. The Aral Sea Disaster // Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. – 2007. – Vol. 35. – P. 47–72.
6. Stirling, A. “Opening Up” and “Closing Down”: Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology // Science, Technology, & Human Values. – 2008. – Vol. 33, № 2. – P. 262–294.
7. Гиббонс, М., Лимож, К., Новотны, Х. [и др.] Новое производство знания: Динамика науки и исследований в современных обществах / пер. с англ. А.А. Игнатьева. – М.: Логос, 2011. – 208 с.
8. Funtowicz, S.O., Ravetz, J. R. Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy. – Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990. – 231 p.
9. Rittel, H. W. J., Webber, M. M. Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning // Policy Sciences. – 1973. – Vol. 4, № 2. – P. 155–169.
10. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order / S. Jasanoff (ed.). – London; New York: Routledge, 2004. – 336 p.
