HUQUQSHUNOS TALABALARDA TILGA ASOSLANGAN TOPSHIRIQLAR ORQALI TANQIDIY FIKRLASH KO‘NIKMALARINI RIVOJLANTIRISH
Kalit so‘zlar:
tanqidiy fikrlash; yuridik ingliz tili; topshiriq asosida o‘qitish; huquqshunos talabalar; argumentatsiya.Annotatsiya
Ushbu maqolada yuridik ingliz tili darslarida tilga asoslangan topshiriqlar orqali huquqshunos talabalarida tanqidiy fikrlash ko‘nikmalarini rivojlantirish masalasi tahlil qilinadi. Zamonaviy nazariy manbalarga tayangan holda, maqolada sud ishlarini tahlil qilish, huquqiy argumentatsiya va muammoli vaziyatlarni hal etishga qaratilgan topshiriqlar yuqori darajadagi fikrlash ko‘nikmalarini rivojlantirishda samarali vosita ekanligi asoslanadi. Sifatli auditoriya tadqiqoti asosida topshiriqlarga asoslangan o‘qitishning talabalarning analitik fikrlashiga ta’siri o‘rganildi. Natijalar talabalar interpretatsiya, baholash va xulosa chiqarish ko‘nikmalarining rivojlanganini ko‘rsatadi. Maqolada yuridik ingliz tili kurslari uchun tanqidiy fikrlashni integratsiya qiluvchi metodik model taklif etiladi.
Iqtiboslar
1. Arias-Rodríguez G. L. Developing critical thinking through an integrated skills task-based approach // Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura. — 2014. — Vol. 19, No. 1. — P. 23–43.
2. Bloom B. S. (ed.). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. — New York, NY: David McKay, 1956.
3. Braun V., Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology // Qualitative Research in Psychology. — 2006. — Vol. 3, No. 2. — P. 77–101. — DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
4. Ennis R. H. Critical thinking and subject specificity: clarification and needed research // Educational Researcher. — 1989. — Vol. 18, No. 3. — P. 4–10.
5. Facione P. A. Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. — Millbrae, CA: Measured Reasons LLC, 2011.
6. Gentner D., Smith L. Analogical reasoning // In: Ramachandran V. S. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Human Behavior. — 2nd ed. — San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2012. — P. 130–136.
7. Halpern D. F. Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. — 5th ed. — New York, NY: Psychology Press, 2014.
8. Kuhn D. Critical thinking as discourse // Human Development. — 2019. — Vol. 62, No. 3. — P. 146–164. — DOI: 10.1159/000500171.
9. Lantolf J. P., Thorne S. L. Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. — Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
10. LeClercq T., Garrison M. Guide to legal writing style. — 5th ed. — New York, NY: Wolters Kluwer, 2009.
11. Medina R. Teaching critical thinking to law students // Journal of Legal Education. — 2012. — Vol. 62, No. 2. — P. 1–24.
12. Nunan D. Second language teaching and learning. — Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle, 1999.
13. Paul R., Elder L. Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life. — 2nd ed. — Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2006.
14. Paul R., Elder L. Critical thinking competency standards // Journal of Developmental Education. — 2007. — Vol. 30, No. 3. — P. 34–35.
15. Vanicheva T., Kah M., Ponidelko L. Task-based language teaching as a way to develop critical thinking among engineering students // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. — 2015. — Vol. 206. — P. 160–164. — DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.049.
16. Willingham D. T. Critical thinking: why is it so hard to teach? // American Educator. — 2007. — Vol. 31, No. 2. — P. 8–19.
