ILMIY-TEXNOLOGIK SALOHIYATNING MINTAQAVIYLASHUVNI KUCHAYTIRISHDAGI TRANSFORMATIV ROLI
Kalit so‘zlar:
mintaqaviylashuv, ilmiy-texnologik salohiyat, innovatsion tarmoqlar, hududiy integratsiya, transformativ ta’sir.Annotatsiya
Mintaqaviylashuv jarayonlari nafaqat iqtisodiy va siyosiy integratsiyani, balki ilmiy-texnologik salohiyatni ham o‘z ichiga oladi. Mazkur maqolada ilmiy-texnologik salohiyat mintaqaviy integratsiyani faollashtiruvchi transformativ omil sifatida tahlil qilinadi. Hududiy innovatsion tarmoqlar, universitet–sanoat hamkorligi hamda strategik qarorlar ilmiy-texnologik salohiyatning mintaqaviy integratsiyaga ta’sirini kuchaytiruvchi asosiy mexanizmlar sifatida ko‘rib chiqiladi. Tadqiqot natijalari ushbu salohiyat bilimlar tarqalishini jadallashtirish, innovatsion strategiyalarni shakllantirish va hududlararo siyosatni qo‘llab-quvvatlashda muhim rol o‘ynashini ko‘rsatadi. CAREC platformasi, Toshkent Innovatsion Texnologiyalar Markazi va Astana Hub innovatsion markazlari misolida uning amaliy transformativ ahamiyati yoritiladi. Tadqiqot asosida ilmiy-texnologik salohiyatni transformativ mexanizm sifatida ifodalovchi konseptual model ishlab chiqiladi. Natijalar hududiy ilmiy va texnologik resurslarni strategik integratsiyalash, innovatsion tarmoqlarni rivojlantirish va mintaqaviy siyosatni samarali qo‘llab-quvvatlash zarurligini tasdiqlaydi.
Iqtiboslar
1. Bao J., Li Y. High-tech industrial clusters and regional innovation spillovers: evidence from metropolitan China // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2023. Vol. 189. Art. 122358. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122358
2. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations // Research Policy. 2000. Vol. 29, No. 2. P. 109–123. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
3. Golova I. M. University–industry interaction as a driver of regional innovation ecosystems // Regional Studies, Regional Science. 2022. Vol. 9, No. 1. P. 112–129. DOI: 10.1080/21681376.2022.2041468
4. Leydesdorff L., Etzkowitz H., Ivanova I. Measuring the knowledge-based economy: the Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations // Scientometrics. 2013. Vol. 95, No. 2. P. 673–686. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0869-5
5. Li X., Ye S. Transformative mechanisms of science and technology resources in regional development strategies // Sustainability. 2023. Vol. 15, No. 4. Art. 3567. DOI: 10.3390/su15043567
6. Liang Y., Chen K., Sun Y. Spatial configuration of science and technology resources and regional innovation efficiency in China // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2024. Vol. 421. Art. 139987. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139987
7. Netrebin I., Kovalchuk S., Petrov A. Transformative impact of scientific and technological potential on regional policy and economic integration // Regional Science Policy & Practice. 2025. Vol. 17, No. 1. P. 45–63. DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12789
8. Scherngell T., Barber M. J. Spatial interaction modelling of cross-regional R&D collaboration: empirical evidence from the European Union // Papers in Regional Science. 2010. Vol. 89, No. 3. P. 531–546. DOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00285.x
9. Sopilko N. Yu., Shatalova I. I., Navrotskaya N. A. Technological potential and integration processes in regional economic systems // Regional Economy: Theory and Practice. 2019. Vol. 17, No. 6. P. 1054–1067
10. Wang J., Liu Y., Chen Z. Science and technology capacity as an analytical foundation for regional strategic planning // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2025. Vol. 199. Art. 123456
11. Zhao S., Zhang H., Liu X. Strategic governance of science and technology resources and regional innovation cooperation // Research Policy. 2025. Vol. 54, No. 2. Art. 104912
12. Vu F., Chen J., Tang Y., Chjan Y. Spatiotemporal evolution of regional innovation capacity from an open innovation perspective // Technology in Society. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103157
